Elements Of The Argument free essay sample

: # 8220 ; What Is Poverty? # 8221 ; Essay, Research Paper Elementss of the Argument: # 8220 ; What is Poverty? # 8221 ; Steve Ross Expository Writing Dr. Nancy Nester Final 10/25/96 What do you see poorness to be? Do you have a unequivocal account of it or make you see it an abstract circumstance? In the article # 8220 ; What is Poverty? # 8221 ; , Jo Goodwin Parker gives her thoughts on what poorness is. First given as a address, this article is written as an onslaught on human emotion. Her usage of connotative linguistic communication creates many rough images of her experiences in a life of poorness. By utilizing these images, Parker is capable of doing the reader to experience many emotions and forces the reader to oppugn his or her ain stereotypes of the hapless. With the usage of connotative linguistic communication and the ability to elicit emotion, Parker successfully compels the reader to analyze his or her ideas and beliefs on who the hapless are. We will write a custom essay sample on Elements Of The Argument or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Parker # 8217 ; s usage of connotative linguistic communication causes the reader to experience many emotions. Of these emotions, a outstanding one is guilt. Parker is capable of doing the reader experience guilty for the ownerships that he or she has. For illustration, she uses the phrase # 8220 ; You say in your clean apparels coming from your clean house, # 8230 ; # 8221 ; ( Parker 237 ) . This causes the reader to experience guilty for holding the chance to be clean when we all know that she doesn # 8217 ; t have the same. She calls hot H2O a # 8220 ; luxury # 8221 ; ( Parker 237 ) . To those populating in poorness hot H2O is a luxury. The unimpoverished return it for granted and neer before considered it anything other than a basic ownership. When the reader hears that person else calls it a luxury that they can non afford, he or she can # 8217 ; T aid but experience guilty for holding it as a basic ownership. Parker besides attacks the guilt of the reader through narratives of her kids. She knows that some readers may non experience guilty for things that happen to her, but when kids are introduced to the state of affairs they will experience more guilt. She says, # 8220 ; My kids have no excess books, no magazines, no excess pencils, or crayons, or paper # 8230 ; # 8221 ; ( Parker 238 ) . The reader can non assist but experience guilty for holding these basic things when her kids, who need them, make non. Another thing that Parker makes the audience experience guilty for holding is wellness. She says, speaking about her kids, # 8220 ; # 8230 ; most of import of all, they do non hold health. # 8221 ; ( Parker 238 ) . She goes on farther to depict what is incorrect with them. Parker says, # 8220 ; They have worms, they have infections, they have pink-eye all summer # 8221 ; ( 238 ) . These descriptions of her kids cause the reader to experience atrocious for them. By doing the reader experience this manner she is increasing the degree of guilt the reader besides feels. She is really successful in carry throughing this and this success causes her statement to go really powerful. Not merely does she do us experience guilty for holding ownerships that she can non, but Parker besides makes us experience guilty about the stereotypes we hold. She knows what society # 8217 ; s stereotypes are and she successfully combats them. Parker knows that society thinks the hapless Don # 8217 ; t want to work. To assail this she tells of why she can # 8217 ; t work. She has three kids. The last clip she had a occupation the baby-sitter she left them with did non take attention of them. She returned to happen all three in unsafe state of affairss. Her babe had non been changed since she had left it at that place, her other was playing with a piece of crisp glass, and her oldest was playing entirely at the border of a lake ( Parker 236-237 ) . Her opportunities of happening a better baby-sitter are slender because she can non afford a nursery school due to fact that she makes excessively small ( Parker 237 ) . This is why she can non work. Her inability to work leads to many of the other stereotypes that society has of the hapless. Society inquiries why the hapless can non be clean. She tells of how without money she can non afford any cleansing supplies ( Parker 237 ) . Parker Tells of how she saved for two months to purchase a jar of Vaseline and when she had eventually saved plenty the monetary value had gone up two cents ( 237 ) . She can non rinse in soap because it has to be saved to clean the babe # 8217 ; s nappies ( Parker 237 ) . She efficaciously shows how society # 8217 ; s stereotypes are wrong. She is capable of doing the reader experience guilty for the stereotypes and causes the reader to inquiry why he or she has them. If the audience would merely take a small clip to seek and understand her state of affairs they would cognize how baseless the stereotypes are. Parker is besides successful in arousing understanding from the reader. She uses connotative linguistic communication to make distressing images of what poorness is. For illustration, she calls poorness an # 8220 ; acid that trickles on pride until pride is worn off ( Parker 239 ) . # 8221 ; Not merely is poverty bad but it is an acid. An acid is a atrocious thing. It burns and corrodes off at something until it no longer exists. By this concluding poorness is destructing her life. This phrase forces the reader to see poorness as something worse than they had of all time thought before. She shows poorness as a expletive, as a # 8220 ; chisel that french friess on award until award is worn off ( Parker 239 ) . # 8221 ; Parker starts about every paragraph with a new definition of what poorness is. Some illustrations are: # 8221 ; poorness is being tired # 8221 ; ( Parker 236 ) , # 8220 ; poorness is ungraded # 8221 ; ( 237 ) , # 8220 ; poorness is inquiring for aid # 8221 ; ( 237 ) , and # 8220 ; poorness is looking into a black hereafter # 8221 ; ( 238 ) . All of these phrases create a different image of poorness and each one is a success in arousing understanding from the reader. They all force the reader to conceive of poorness in a new manner. We all knew it was bad but Parker makes us recognize how black poorness is. She shows us that there is no hope for the hapless without understanding. Parker is successful in acquiring her point across with her usage of connotative linguistic communication and her ability to make images. She has done a good occupation of assailing the reader and acquiring him or her to listen to what she has to state. Even though she attacks the audience she does it in an appropriate manner whereas she does non come across as violative. All in all, Parker has done a successful occupation at making images and utilizing the readers # 8217 ; emotion to acquire an audience to listen to her predicament and the battles of other # 8217 ; s in her state of affairs.